‘When Mom is busy driving out demons, she allows me to go to bed’
Posted by The Times - Breaking News on 1st August 2009
Dad goes to court to keep 11-year-old son away from his former wife’s ‘cult-like rituals’ Ex-husband ‘had to concoct something to make it sound crazy … He couldn’t base it on me just being a Christian’
In the corridors of the South Gauteng High Court, a cheerful 11-year-old runs towards his mother to give her a hug. Inside the court room, however, a note in his handwriting paints a chilling picture of life in their Johannesburg home. “All things that have pictures of skulls, ghosts, magic, mythical creatures, superhero e.g. Spiderman and pictures of celebrities are burnt in a fire,” the note says. “People who are ‘Possessed’ are by choice prayed for and most of them make scary noises and this happens during all night Friday night and when an exorcism happens I am allowed to go to sleep.”
The boy’s note forms part of an urgent challenge by his father to have his son live with him until a custody dispute with the boy’s mother, whom he divorced nine years ago, is resolved. The boy spent the recent school holidays with his father, a foreign-born businessman who recently moved back to South Africa. When the boy was due to be returned to his mother’s home, the father instead went to court, claiming that he needed to protect the boy from the mother’s “cult rituals” — including exorcisms and excessive prayer. Conducting her own defence, the businesswoman — a former beauty queen in her 30s — denied she was a member of a cult or that any exorcisms took place at her home. Instead, she said she had been a born-again Christian — “essentially a Bible-believing Christian” — since 2006, and held prayer meetings in a room outside her house twice a week. She was adamant that she was bringing up her son, and his four-year-old brother from a subsequent relationship, in accordance with her beliefs. She said her ex-husband did not like her Christianity and “had to concoct something to make it sound crazy … He couldn’t base it on me just being a Christian,” she said.
The woman also had to bear testimony from her mother, who supported her former son in-law’s application, and had to respond to claims about her faith, her preference for vegetarian food and homeopathic medicine.
In court papers, her mother claimed her daughter had been “brainwashed” after becoming a member of a “cult”, and was forcing her grandsons to be a part of it. She said she had witnessed an exorcism at the house and was worried that she “will soon be burying her grandchildren”. She also claimed the children were not being fed properly because her daughter regarded certain food, such as sweets and meat, as having the devil in them. But the boy’s mother said she believed in “healthy eating” and moderation. “I don’t want my children to be slothful,” she told the court.
And although she is a vegetarian — and had been before she became a born-again Christian — she said she cooked meat for her eldest son, because it was his choice.
But the biggest issue her mother and ex-husband have is with her religious practices. They claimed she had formed her own church, which she ran from her home, and that the focus of their faith was to “conduct spiritual warfare” to protect themselves from “all evil devils and demons” .
They claimed the boy was forced to take part in regular “praying ceremonies” and “specific rituals” and was “scared” of returning to his mother because he could become the subject of an exorcism and was prevented from doing “normal things”. “He is not allowed to own or ride a skateboard, wear any ‘forbidden’ T-shirts, read Harry Potter or go to the movies with his friend or on a school outing,” the father said in court papers. The woman’s mother also claimed that she refused to take the boy to doctors because they were “evil and from the devil”.
But the mother said her son had never been forced to participate in the prayer meetings she held at her home, although she did take him to church on Sundays.
She denied not taking her son to doctors, saying that although she preferred homeopathic medicine, she never forced this on anyone else. In fact, she said, she had taken the boy to visit doctors and dentists regularly, as well as a psychologist.
She did, however, concede that she did not allow her son to read certain books, including the Harry Potter series, and to watch certain television programmes or films because of his age.
“I raise my children in my faith. I didn’t know there was anything wrong with that,” she told the court. “The issue is whether I raise my children Christian or atheist.”
She added in court papers: “I am, after all, raising my son in the best way I know. As far as I know, the parent who has custody has the right to dictate the minor child’s everyday lifestyle, as long as there is no abuse or harm involved.”
But the father, who did not want to speak to the Sunday Times, in his court papers, said he simply did not agree with his ex-wife’s beliefs. “As (his) father, I do not subscribe to the respondent’s new faith nor approve of it. I find it fundamentalist and bordering on the absurd.” On Thursday the court granted a three-month interim order for the boy and his parents to seek counselling and for investigations by, among others, the family advocate and a nutritionist to be completed. In the meantime, the boy will stay with his father and his mother will have access rights. hawkeyk@sundaytimes.co.za
KIM HAWKEY
Posted in PaintballCraze | Comments Off